According to the files, this would be manned by a single pilot and could be used for missions involving possible colonization.Īs per the report, it is focused on "traditional human pilots" rather than "cyborg-enhanced astrobots." When tasked with completing missions, one human can only control a maximum of four crafts, according to the research, which looks at ways the human brain could be developed to improve this. The documents, obtained by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), also outline plans to send multiple spaceships, each manned by a single pilot, to "colonize" deep space, as well as research into how humans can control robots with their minds.Ī spaceship with nuclear-powered electromagnets would shield the manned spacecraft from radiation, as would "halo spacecraft with powerful radars" to scout for incoming objects, as well as exploration and mining craft. and time machines," the report says, after looking at various ways of "controlling gravity." The study also suggests that "wormholes" in spacetime could be used for interstellar travel.Īccording to another file, future aerospace platforms "might have propulsion systems that modify their surrounding space time geometry to implement faster than light space flight or produce levitation via anti-gravity." So for now, all those amazing antigravity gizmos are going to have to remain within the realm of science fiction.Įxplore the links on the next page to learn even more about gravity."It might be possible to produce exotic phenomena such as faster-than-light travel. Many scientists strongly believe that antigravity isn't possible, given what we know about the universe and the laws that govern it. Antigravity, on the other hand, involves lessening the effects of gravitational pull on an object, and the science just isn't there yet. Neither is the levitation effect achieved in 2007 by countering Casimir force, a quantum force that essentially causes objects to stick to one another - a type of nanofriction. NASA even published a booklet titled "Responding to Mechanical Antigravity" to help amateur and professional researchers, most of whom submitted ideas (as many as 100 per year) involving machines that falsely appeared to create an antigravity effect.Īnd just in case you're wondering, NASA's zero-gravity flights aboard modified C-9 aircraft are not examples of antigravity. Or why NASA has chosen previously to research antigravity through projects with names like Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Project (1996-2002). You might be starting to see why "antigravity" is a taboo subject. In 2002, noted aviation journalist Nick Cook's research into supposed Nazi antigravity research failed to win over critics. No one - including NASA researchers - has been able to replicate this experiment in the nearly two decades since that time. The experiment involved levitating a superconducting disc above a magnet. There's been no shortage of hoaxes, conspiracy theories and credibility-straining reports regarding its research.įor example, in 1992, Russian physicist Evgeny Podkletnov claimed to have successfully tested a device that shields an object from gravity. First, however, we'd just have to drastically alter our understanding of physics and figure out how to counter this powerful force.Īs such, antigravity technology remains both the Holy Grail and a red flag. It would slash the energy demands of travel and transportation. Antigravity technology would revolutionize space exploration and energy production.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |